Risk factors determining adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

OBJECTIVE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have successfully changed the natural course of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Although they are highly effective drugs, their clinical benefit is conditioned by adherence. This study aims to analyse the adherence of CML patients treated with TKIs and to identify the main factors influencing their adherence to TKIs treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An 8-month prospective, observational, multicentre study which included patients diagnosed with CML on treatment with TKIs attending the outpatient departments (OPD) of the Pharmacy Services of the participating hospitals. Adherence was assessed using two methods: the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ) and the register of treatment dispensations from the OPDs. To analyse the predictors of adherence, a questionnaire was developed to report demographic and socio-economic information on the patients. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients enrolled in this study. Adherence rate was 56.9% (n = 74) among individuals, not conditioned by the type of drug used: imatinib (54.8%), nilotinib (63.6%) or dasatinib (54.3%) (p = 0.67). The patient educational level (p = 0.047) and employment status (p = 0.028) were predictors of non-adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence is one of the most relevant parameters affecting the effectiveness of highly effective chronic treatments. Approximately half of our patients showed inadequate adherence to treatment with TKIs, with employment status and the individual's level of education emerging as the determining factors.

Imatinib plasma levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia under routine clinical practice conditions.

INTRODUCTION: The addition of imatinib to the therapeutic arsenal for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has changed the natural course of the disease, in such a way that it is now considered a chronic pathology. However, to achieve therapeutic success, it is necessary to reach adequate plasma concentrations to ensure efficacy and safety.In this study, we aimed to evaluate the plasma concentration of imatinib, analysing its influence on effectiveness and safety in patients with CML. METHODS: We performed a descriptive, multicentre study in which imatinib plasma levels from patients diagnosed with CML between 2019-2020 were analysed. An optimal therapeutic range of 750-1500 ng/mL was established for the stratification of patients, according to their minimum plasma concentrations measured at steady state (Cssmin). RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included, of whom only 39.3% (n = 11) showed Cssmin within the therapeutic range. 100% of patients with Cssmin >750 ng/mL achieved an optimal molecular response, while only 50% of patients with Cssmin <750 ng/mL achieved an optimal molecular response (p = 0.0004). The toxicity rate was 36.4% for patients with Cssmin >1500 ng/mL and 5.9% for those with Cssmin <1500 ng/mL (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This study aimed to describe the correlation between the toxicity and effectiveness of imatinib according to its Cssmin in routine clinical practice conditions. Based on our findings, it would be certainly justified to monitor patient plasma concentrations of imatinib on a daily routine basis in our hospitals.

Imatinib plasma levels in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour under routine clinical practice conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Imatinib is the first therapeutic option for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Previous studies have shown an improvement in patient survival rates following the use of imatinib. Nevertheless, adequate plasma concentrations of imatinib are necessary to achieve such improvement in survival and limit the toxicity of the drug. This study aims to analyse the influence of imatinib plasma concentrations on efficacy and safety in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive, multicentre study analysed plasma levels of imatinib in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the period 2019-2020. An optimal therapeutic range of 750-1500 ng/mL was established for the patient stratification based on their minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state. RESULTS: This study included 11 patients with metastatic disease in total, among whom only 54.5% (n = 6) had a minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state value within the therapeutic range. A median progression-free survival of 7.0 months was recorded for those patients with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state < 750 ng/mL, while that median progression-free survival value remained unachieved for the group with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state > 750 ng/mL (p = 0.005). The toxicity rate was 25% and 14.3% for patients with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state > 1500 ng/mL and minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state ≤1500 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The present study aims to describe the correlation between the toxicity and effectiveness of imatinib as a function of minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state under routine clinical practice conditions. The results described here show the usefulness of imatinib plasma concentrations monitoring as part of the standard daily routine in our hospitals.

Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of confirmed gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin versus vancomycin on the management catheter-related bloodstream  nfections in oncology patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out including all patients admitted  at the Medical Oncology Unit between 2010 and 2018 with positive blood  cultures confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infections due to gram- positive microorganism, who were treated with either vancomycin or  daptomycin. The primary end point was all cause 30-days mortality, 30-days  hospital readmission and length of hospital stay (length of hospital stay). Results: A total of 70 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections were included in the present study: vancomycin was administered to  61.4% (n = 43) and daptomycin to 38.6% (n = 27) of  patients. 78.5% (n = 55) of isolated bacteria showed a vancomycin minimum  inhibitory concentration ≤ 1 µg/ml. No differences were observed  between the two groups of patients regarding the 30-day mortality rate rate  (32.6% [n = 14] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.797), the 30-day re-admission rate (30.2% [n = 13] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.957) or the length of  hospital stay (18.9 versus 16.5 days; p = 0.562). Nephrotoxicity rate was  equivalent in both groups: a 7% (n = 3) of vancomycin goup versus a 7.4% (n  = 2) of daptomycin group (p = 0.946). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that both antibiotics are equivalent in their  safety and effectiveness. Therefore, vancomycin should continue being the  treatment of chose for gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections,  in particular at hospital centres with a low prevalence of strains that show  diminished susceptibility to vancomycin.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de la daptomicina frente a la  vancomicina en el tratamiento de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular en pacientes oncológicos.Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a los pacientes ingresados en la Unidad de Oncología-Médica entre 2010-2018 con infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular causada por  grampositivos, y que fueron tratados con vancomicina o daptomicina. Como  objetivos principales se determinaron la tasa de mortalidad por todas las  causas a los 30 días, el reingreso hospitalario a los 30 días y la duración de la  estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: El estudio incluyó 70 pacientes con infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular: el 61,4% (n = 43) recibió  vancomicina y el 38,6% (n = 27) daptomicina. El 78,5% (n = 55) de las  bacterias aisladas presentaron una concentración mínima inhibitoria de  vancomicina ≤ 1 µg/ml. No se observaron diferencias entre ambos grupos de  pacientes en cuanto a la tasa de mortalidad a 30 días (32,6% [n = 14]  frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,797), la tasa de reingreso a 30 días (30,2% [n  = 13] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,957) o la duración de la hospitalización (18,9 frente a 16,5 días; p = 0,562). La tasa de nefrotoxicidad fue equivalente  en ambos grupos: 7% (n = 3) para vancomicina frente al 7,4% (n = 2) para  daptomicina (p = 0,946). CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados muestran que ambos antibióticos son equivalentes en su seguridad y eficacia. Por ello, vancomicina debería seguir siendo el tratamiento de elección para la infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular, especialmente en centros con  una baja prevalencia de cepas con una susceptibilidad disminuida a  ancomicina.

Vancomicina frente a daptomicina como tratamiento de las bacteriemias asociadas a catéter y causadas por grampositivos en el paciente oncológico / Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of confirmed gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in oncology patients

Objetivo: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de la daptomicina frente ala vancomicina en el tratamiento de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneoasociadas a catéter vascular en pacientes oncológicos.Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a los pacientesingresados en la Unidad de Oncología-Médica entre 2010-2018 coninfección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular causadapor grampositivos, y que fueron tratados con vancomicina o daptomicina.Como objetivos principales se determinaron la tasa de mortalidad portodas las causas a los 30 días, el reingreso hospitalario a los 30 días yla duración de la estancia hospitalaria.Resultados: El estudio incluyó 70 pacientes con infecciones del torrentesanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular: el 61,4% (n = 43) recibió vancomicinay el 38,6% (n = 27) daptomicina. El 78,5% (n = 55) de las bacteriasaisladas presentaron una concentración mínima inhibitoria de vancomicina≤ 1 μg/ml. No se observaron diferencias entre ambos grupos depacientes en cuanto a la tasa de mortalidad a 30 días (32,6% [n = 14] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,797), la tasa de reingreso a 30 días (30,2%[n = 13] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,957) o la duración de la hospitalización(18,9 frente a 16,5 días; p = 0,562). La tasa de nefrotoxicidadfue equivalente en ambos grupos: 7% (n = 3) para vancomicina frente al7,4% (n = 2) para daptomicina (p = 0,946).Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados muestran que ambos antibióticos sonequivalentes en su seguridad y eficacia. Por ello, vancomicina deberíaseguir siendo el tratamiento de elección para la infección del torrentesanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular, especialmente en centros con unabaja prevalencia de cepas con una susceptibilidad disminuida a vancomicina.

Objective: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin versusvancomycin on the management catheter-related bloodstream infectionsin oncology patients.Method: A retrospective study was carried out including all patientsadmitted at the Medical Oncology Unit between 2010 and 2018 withpositive blood cultures confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infectionsdue to gram-positive microorganism, who were treated with either vancomycinor daptomycin. The primary end point was all cause 30-daysmortality, 30-days hospital readmission and length of hospital stay (lengthof hospital stay).Results: A total of 70 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infectionswere included in the present study: vancomycin was administeredto 61.4% (n = 43) and daptomycin to 38.6% (n = 27) of patients.78.5% (n = 55) of isolated bacteria showed a vancomycin minimuminhibitory concentration ≤ 1 μg/ml. No differences were observed betweenthe two groups of patients regarding the 30-day mortality rate rate (32.6% [n = 14] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.797), the 30-day re-admissionrate (30.2% [n = 13] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.957) or the lengthof hospital stay (18.9 versus 16.5 days; p = 0.562). Nephrotoxicity ratewas equivalent in both groups: a 7% (n = 3) of vancomycin goup versus a7.4% (n = 2) of daptomycin group (p = 0.946).Conclusions: Our results show that both antibiotics are equivalent intheir safety and effectiveness. Therefore, vancomycin should continuebeing the treatment of chose for gram-positive catheter-related bloodstreaminfections, in particular at hospital centres with a low prevalence ofstrains that show diminished susceptibility to vancomycin.

Patient-reported outcomes and digital literacy of patients treated in an oncology day hospital unit.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use, via a computer registry, allows patients to report their symptoms enabling the detection of early signs of progression of the disease. For such a record, the patient needs to show certain skills in new technologies use. The present study aimed to analyse the perception and degree of digital literacy of patients undergoing oncological treatment in an Oncology Day Hospital (ODH). METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed, where the degree of literacy of patients attending antineoplastic treatment at the ODH was examined by means of an anonymous survey. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients have been included in the study. The proportion of subjects who use the electronic mail (TM) and the Internet on a daily basis was 45.1% and 70.5%, respectively, and up to 77.9% from the subjects considered that the use of digital 2.0 strategies could help improve communication between healthcare professional and patient.The TM was determined by the age, educational level and employment status of the individual. Furthermore, the age of the patients conditioned their perception of the usefulness of the web 2.0 tools (T2.0). CONCLUSION: This study allowed us to establish a target patient profile to conduct the efficient monitoring of cancer progression by PROs. The results have shown that approximately 60% of the patients in our population could be potential candidates to receive PROs-based health care. This approach enables earlier detection of symptoms and signs of progression and consequently, improves health outcomes for cancer patients.